******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 05 Oct 2008 Time: 07:06:35 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: BA Gregg Coach: All Virginia Schools LDArea: Public Forum Coach or Judge LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 05 Oct 2008 Time: 07:13:39 LDLastWords: You won't see me in a round, I hope, as I am in Tab and if I am there... something very bad has hit the fan. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 05 Oct 2008 Time: 07:13:55 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: BA Gregg Coach: All Virginia Schools LDArea: Public Forum Coach or Judge LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 05 Oct 2008 Time: 07:15:45 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Daniel May Coach: USN LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: moving down the flowabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 05 Oct 2008 Time: 16:16:51 LDLastWords: I enjoy good clash at the criterion level of the debate. I tend not to vote on a priori arguments unless the debater clearly explains why the argument really is a priori. Many debaters fail to do this. Finally, I tend not to like critical arguments. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Adhar Srivastava Coach: Syosset LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 19 Oct 2008 Time: 23:30:36 LDLastWords: I dont mind a good theory debate, but that being said, I do have a problem when a debater runs theory just to weasel out of the round. Run theory if its actually important, not because you just can... ******************************************************************************* Judge: Brother Kevin Tidd Coach: La Salle College HS (PA) LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 07 Nov 2008 Time: 12:05:12 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Brother Kevin Tidd Coach: Delbarton School (NJ) LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 07 Nov 2008 Time: 12:06:11 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Michael Fabiano Coach: none LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 12 Nov 2008 Time: 12:47:27 LDLastWords: I really don't care how fast anyone talks as long as it's clear. Speaking fast and mumbling will frustrate me. Just also know that the flow is where I make my decision, so whatever is on there and whatever can be weighed, I'll vote on it. Criteria are necessarily unless you're doing something unique. Please link every issue that needs to be weighed through your standard/criterion ******************************************************************************* Judge: Patrick Corcoran Coach: Kellenberg LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 16 Nov 2008 Time: 17:10:53 LDLastWords: I take myself out of the debate. It is the debater’s responsibility to convince me they win the round. "Preferred Rate" - Rate does not matter as long as I can understand you. But I cannot give you a win if I don't know what you are saying. Values, Criteria, Rebuttal, Crystallization - The debater decides how to "package" their arguments. The clearer the arguments the better. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Sohail Syed Coach: Niskayuna, Arthur L Johnson LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 17 Nov 2008 Time: 11:03:37 LDLastWords: I like Theory debates. They aren't just about fairness, they are about competing interps. I like Critical Theory, but make it clear and read it slower. I don't default Truth testing, I compare worlds. This means I view arguments as offense/defense and skeptical arguments will probably lose the round unless you frame why I should use Truth Testing. I disclose. Avg speaks will be 26, maybe 25. +1 speaks for every minute of speech time or prep you don't use. Dont fabricate evidence. You'll regret it. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Betty Rosen Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 17 Nov 2008 Time: 18:45:15 LDLastWords: I vote based only on what is said in the round - I won't inject bias or preferences about debating style into my decision. That said, I would prefer you to make substantial arguments rather than random theory debate, if possible. Speak as fast as you want as long as you practice good speed reading technique; preferably a little slower than, say, standard policy speed-reading speed, if possible. I am fine with unusual argumentation but equally fine with a very traditional value-criterion and argument structure. Basically, do whatever you want and have fun! ******************************************************************************* Judge: Isaac Bloch Coach: Berkeley Carroll LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 17 Nov 2008 Time: 23:47:41 LDLastWords: I debated for four years, went to the TOC twice, and now coach Berkeley Carroll. Basically I love the creative possibilities that LD offers and thus am fine with anything you want to do. I often ran "critical" positions and like to see them run well, but I will not like it if a bunch of Zizek cards are read without much explanation. I don't particularly like theory, so make sure that the abuse story isn't totally ridiculous because if it is I probably will only vote on it if it is mishandled. Speed is fine as long as it doesn't go too far above 300 wpm. Be smart. ******************************************************************************* Judge: John Monagle Coach: Arthur L. Johnson HS LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 18 Nov 2008 Time: 09:36:40 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 18 Nov 2008 Time: 21:05:24 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Melanie Plaza Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 18 Nov 2008 Time: 21:55:59 LDLastWords: I try to evaluate the round exactly as the debaters instruct me to. Although, I have a relatively high threshold for theory arguments. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Rushabh Doshi Coach: Randolph LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: moving down the flownot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 22 Nov 2008 Time: 10:50:39 LDLastWords: I debated 4 years for Randolph. Was offered a chance at competing at TOC 3 years but never went to compete. Speed is fine. Critical arguments are fine if warranted. Theory is ok, though the I have a lower overall threshold for rejecting theory because it is usually poorly run. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Usha Sahay Coach: Millburn High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 22 Nov 2008 Time: 13:58:38 LDLastWords: I prefer substantive arguments to theory, critical stuff, etc. I'll listen to everything, but I don't follow theory, complex philosophical args like Nietzsche, or speed well, so run them at your own risk. ******************************************************************************* Judge: anya shakhmeyster Coach: Plano East Senior High/ Lady Bird Johnson High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 22 Nov 2008 Time: 17:09:36 LDLastWords: I feel that logic is extremely imperative.A debater stating that he/she won an argument merely because the opponent doesn't have specific evidence against it doesn't mean the opposing argument is not logical. Evidence (though is needed to back up certain key points) and definitional debate should not take over the round. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Amanda Liverzani Coach: Newtown, The Meadows LDArea: Summer LD Instructor LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 22 Nov 2008 Time: 22:02:41 LDLastWords: I will only vote on theory if in-round abuse can be demonstrated. When in doubt don't run theory in front of me. In general I'm accepting of any practice in LD so long as it can be clearly warranted. I'm sympathetic to arguments about ways social, political, and economic inequalities can be minimized both inside and outside of debate rounds. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Ping Chu Coach: Plano SENIOR High LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 23 Nov 2008 Time: 03:58:27 LDLastWords: 1- I don't mind the unconventional but I do mind the unwarranted and unstructured. 2- Speed with clarity is definitely fine, but you should know that I tend to write somewhat slowly, so use discretion. 3- Use theory responsibly. 4- I get distracted by funny breathing. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Ping Chu Coach: Plano SENIOR High LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 23 Nov 2008 Time: 03:59:38 LDLastWords: 1- I don't mind the unconventional but I do mind the unwarranted and unstructured. 2- Speed with clarity is definitely fine, but you should know that I tend to write somewhat slowly, so use discretion. 3- Use theory responsibly. 4- I get distracted by funny breathing. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Brandon Sherman Coach: Millburn LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 23 Nov 2008 Time: 09:42:00 LDLastWords: You can ignore everything above if you keep in mind that I decide the round based on standards, impacts to those standards, and weighing of those impacts against competing impacts over the course of the round. No new arguments. Other than that, do whatever you want. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Eric Sporkin Coach: Syosset LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 23 Nov 2008 Time: 09:55:49 LDLastWords: I'll vote for any type of argument, but you need to tell me why it wins you the round. Weighing is really important. So are warrants. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jesse Klinger Coach: Great Neck South LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 23 Nov 2008 Time: 12:34:24 LDLastWords: I consider arguments presented in round the sole jurisdiction of my ballot. If you have any further questions feel free to ask me before the round. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Thuy-Lan Lite Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 24 Nov 2008 Time: 13:54:29 LDLastWords: Good speaking is important, but not as important as analysis and argumentation. Courtesy is a must. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Vivian Feig Coach: Walt Whitman, Torrey Pines High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 24 Nov 2008 Time: 15:36:34 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Michael Contillo Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 25 Nov 2008 Time: 16:32:40 LDLastWords: Be Creative. I will vote on theory if you can convince me there is an actual abuse. Give me an order in which I should evaluate the round at some point during your speech. My longer paradigm is on victory briefs wiki. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Olivia Manion Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 25 Nov 2008 Time: 21:47:30 LDLastWords: I will not vote against a debater solely for exceeding the preferred speed, but I and your opponents need to be able to hear and process your words. I will not stop you at time if you are in the middle of a sentence, but you should pay attention to your own timer and/or my signals. Sarcasm and rudeness have no place in a debate round. Keep in mind that LD debate is philosophy-based not only in terms of the types of arguments/evidence used, but in terms of structure as well, i.e., it is supposed to be logic- and value-oriented. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Bill Koren Coach: Penn Leadership LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 26 Nov 2008 Time: 12:20:59 LDLastWords: I typically look to the value/criterion as a means of weighing the round; however, if a standard is not clearly established or you compel me to step outside of that framework, I will evaluate net impacts. I don't like speed. Please give clear voting issues that are weighed and impacted. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Alex Weaver Coach: Millburn LDArea: Former LD Coach LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 26 Nov 2008 Time: 14:09:45 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Charles J. Cirronella Coach: Kellenberg MHS LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 26 Nov 2008 Time: 19:09:38 LDLastWords: I prefer a logical flow of arguments and look unfavorably upon debating theory. I like a methodical approach in rebuttals and a clear reason as to why you should win the round (through voting issues). Mentioning an opponent's argument does not constitute a rebuttal. Explain to me why your response is warranted and how it impacts the resolution. In my decision for the round, I weigh heavily on who better supports his/her value structure. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Laura Michel Coach: Barrack Hebrew LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 26 Nov 2008 Time: 21:05:35 LDLastWords: I think that over reliance on debate jargon kills the round. Don't hide behind cards and the like --- you're not going to win because your opponent dropped contention 2 sub-point F. Actually DEBATE the topic, listen to what your opponent is saying, respond to it, and protect your own case. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Mike Brokos Coach: Catonsville LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: line-by-line analysis LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 27 Nov 2008 Time: 07:14:53 LDLastWords: Standards/burdens debate is hugely important, but probably should not come at the expense of actual arguments. If an argument is clearly abusive but dropped, I will have to vote for it, but I will be happy to look past it if given a good reason to. I like but do not prefer theory/critical argumentation; regardless, you must give me some kind of framework to evaluate the round: The criterion is simply the method of doing so that I am most used to. ******************************************************************************* Judge: David Long Coach: Southern Lehigh H.S. LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 28 Nov 2008 Time: 09:01:24 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Kristine DiColandrea Coach: Stuyvesant, FDA LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 28 Nov 2008 Time: 13:34:02 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Virginia Smith Coach: Southern Lehigh LDArea: Speech Coach LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 28 Nov 2008 Time: 15:19:14 LDLastWords: I am more familiar with PF however, I have had some experience with LD. To win your round you need to have good arguments, confidence, good speaking abilities, evidence, and a certain level of persuasion. I pay close attention to every aspect of every speech and cross be confident and you will impress me. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Elizabeth Saionz Coach: Jack M. Barrack Hebrew Academy LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 29 Nov 2008 Time: 09:37:26 LDLastWords: I want to see that you understand the round and can defend your argument dynamically. Respond to the other debater's arguments - debate the TOPIC. Make sure to link your argument back to the values. A good round will contain vigorous point-counterpoint debate. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Steven Liu Coach: Millburn LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 29 Nov 2008 Time: 10:11:32 LDLastWords: Be clear, otherwise someone will be sad. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jack Marzulli Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 29 Nov 2008 Time: 10:57:01 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Rebecca Hansen Coach: LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 29 Nov 2008 Time: 13:37:04 LDLastWords: I am a former LD debater from the NJFL and have been the head debate coach at Whippany Park HS in New Jersey for seven years. I do not have any preconceived notions about how rounds will go because each one is so different from the next. Please establish a clear standard for the round and show me not only why yours is better (unless you agree to a common standard) , but how you better achieve it through your advocacy. Warrants and impacts are critical, but don't throw around cards for the sake of packing your case full of cards. The cards must represent well-reasoned analysis that clearly helps your case. Don't tell me in rebuttals "Extend my Stein card." Reiterate what it is and why it matters in the round. Just because someone said something, it doesn't make it inherently warranted or effective for your case. I do not like the use of meaningless (and misapplied) LD lingo. Don't tell me that every attack is a turn because it's probably not. I can flow speed, but I can't stand unnecessary speed; that is, speed only for the sake of speed. I like a good, clean debate with a lot of clash. That means I'd like to hear arguments clearly, and so, too, will your opponent. I'm very open to interesting, perhaps off-beat arguments. However, you have to make them work. They may be effective, or they may be a liability. It's up to you to sell it to me. I am not an interventionist judge. You have to do the debating and make the arguments you need to make in order to win. Theory and kritiks are fine. Whatever approach you take to the round, it's up to YOU to make it work and to sell it to me. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Preston Spradling Coach: Archbishop Carroll High School LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 08:59:55 LDLastWords: I can handle speed but it does make it more difficult to judge your arguments. Also, I encourage debaters to clash consistently on values and arguments, but to be polite and professional. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Sarah Hom Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 11:19:44 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Gavin Newton-Tanzer Coach: Newtown High School LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableSelect one LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 13:57:53 LDLastWords: I will lean towards a flow-based evaluation of the round, and accept all types of argumentation as long as all premises are justified. I will assume comparative worlds, unless demonstrated otherwise. In general, I want to see: 1) A good round -- where both debaters engage each other and the topic. If that is impossible, then, 2) Teach me something. Debate is a learning activity, and I love to hear about new ideas, concepts, philosophies, issues, policies, etc. And if BOTH of those are out of the question, then, 3) Better make me laugh... If you fail at all three, I will drop you with 20 speaker points and draw a frown on the ballot. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Gavin Newton-Tanzer Coach: Newtown High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableSelect one LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 13:58:48 LDLastWords: I will lean towards a flow-based evaluation of the round, and accept all types of argumentation as long as all premises are justified. I will assume comparative worlds, unless demonstrated otherwise. In general, I want to see: 1) A good round -- where both debaters engage each other and the topic. If that is impossible, then, 2) Teach me something. Debate is a learning activity, and I love to hear about new ideas, concepts, philosophies, issues, policies, etc. And if BOTH of those are out of the question, then, 3) Better make me laugh... If you fail at all three, I will drop you with 20 speaker points and draw a frown on the ballot. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Timothy Coach: LDArea: Collegiate Policy Debater LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 19:04:40 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Timothy Liu Coach: Detroit Country Day School LDArea: Collegiate Policy Debater LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It rarely informs my decision. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 19:08:36 LDLastWords: I debated policy in high school and currently debate for Columbia University. I'm a very flow-centric judge, and line-by-line analysis is very important. I am familiar with most critical literature and will understand most Ks, but will prefer good, fast, hi-tech policy analysis with lots of evidence. Neg: I can be persuaded to vote on anything but warrants are very important--explain your arguments! Theory, etc. are fine. Keep in mind, however, that I'm a policy debater, and while a lot of things transfer over, some hi-tech LD arguments I might not be familiar with. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Waqas R. Jafri Coach: LDArea: No LD Judging Experience LDYears: No Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 19:44:29 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 19:44:47 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Steven Chen Coach: Thomas Jefferson HS for Science and Technology (VA), Walt Whitman HS (MD) LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 30 Nov 2008 Time: 19:45:32 LDLastWords: As said, speaking too quickly is highly, highly discouraged. Use of jargon should be kept to an absolute bare minimum. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Hall Coach: LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It rarely informs my decision. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 01 Dec 2008 Time: 03:46:41 LDLastWords: I like to be persuaded but I vote mainly on the key arguments in the round. A good debater should weigh both sets of arguments against each other. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Michael Miller Coach: Berkeley Carroll LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 01 Dec 2008 Time: 18:56:42 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Osahon Okundaye Coach: LDArea: No LD Judging Experience LDYears: No Experience LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: moving down the flownot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 01 Dec 2008 Time: 23:08:11 LDLastWords: I did policy debate for seven years in high school. My style was technical yet persuasive with emphasis on winning the key arguments and using them to inform the judge's position. I suggest that all debaters attempt a similar track. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jason Wang Coach: Brooklyn Technical High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 08:14:29 LDLastWords: I will pay more attention towards the theory of an argument over how many sources are cited to buttress one. Debaters who concentrate on the key issue(s) of the round over the general debate will generally win my favor. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Kyle Tatz Coach: Scarsdale LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 14:31:33 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Raymond T. Shay Coach: La Salle College HS LDArea: Former Policy Debater LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 15:12:55 LDLastWords: I have judged LD periodically in my role as a head coach. I am a former policy debater (not an LDer), so make sure you clearly explain any LD theory arguments and articulate a decision calculus by the end of the round. I prefer a conversational speed and can only vote on what I can flow. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Thomas Chidiac Coach: Mt. Lebanon LDArea: Public Forum Coach or Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 16:57:20 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Michael Gately Coach: Regis, Collegiate LDArea: Former LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 17:17:49 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Ashley Trice Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 18:35:52 LDLastWords: I don't really have a preference in terms of speed, slow or fast are both fine as long as you maintain clarity. I am willing to listen to a variety of arguments, with one exception. I don't particularly like theory debate, unless there is a clear abuse in the round. Give a clear standard. Warrants, impacts, and weighing are all very important. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Matthew Konya Coach: Pocono Mountain West, Pennsylvania Leadership LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: Experience LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 02 Dec 2008 Time: 21:08:30 LDLastWords: I love speed, I sometimes fall asleep in round so the faster you go the more arguments I flow and I can stay awake (if you go slow your fine). I am also considered a theory hack. Essentially, EVERYTHING is fine, make the round interesting. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Eric W. Olson Coach: Regis LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 06:12:13 LDLastWords: Do not speed read! If I cannot understand your words, I will not consider the point that you are trying to make. You will not succeed by soley attacking the resolution or your opponent's value/criteria; you must establish your own case. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Marta Abel Coach: Ridge LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 06:20:17 LDLastWords: Debater: 3yrs, Judge: 6yrs, Coach: 1yr. If arguments are empty, circular, confusing, unwarranted, etc, I can't vote for them, period. I like substantive debate. I'd like you to impact arguments back to clear criterion/value, but sometimes values debate is so muddy I have to just judge on non-impacted arguments. Use cases that make sense, not just ones that might throw your opponent off. Jargon is both acceptable and best kept at a minimum. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Robert Hausen Coach: Regis LDArea: Former Policy Debater LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 08:12:04 LDLastWords: With respect to speed, I think the operative rule is "clarity of expression." If someone can speak rapidly but at the same time make themselves clearly understood and their key point discernible, I have no problem. My experience, however, is that there are very few LD debaters who can do that. I find that most spreaders swallow both their words and their points, particularly when they are reading their cases. I judge on what I hear and can understand. If I can't hear or understand a point because of excessive speed and poor diction, that point is of no note. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Rosemary Berkery Coach: Regis LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 11:12:32 LDLastWords: Debate is an exercise in oral persuasion--it is not a mathematical exercise intended to award he or she who is able to spew forth the most arguments in a given time. I view seriously that one of the criteria to be used by a judge is clarity of expression. I look for well-reasoned and analyzed arguments presented orderly and clearly. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Sean Hyland Coach: Ridge LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 11:49:24 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Michael Guarini Coach: John Jay HS LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 13:16:26 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Megana Dwarakanath Coach: Randolph High School (NJ) LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 13:21:34 LDLastWords: Don't be afraid to experiment with new ideas/strategies! Running a creative, thoughtful position will likely result in generous speaker points. If you have any questions, please ask before the round. I will disclose if consistent with tournament policy. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Mira Chernick Coach: Lexington LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 16:05:17 LDLastWords: Steer clear of theory unless your opponent is actually, objectively doing something wrong and you are willing to devote time to developing the theory argument. I will vote on theory if convinced but reserve the right to ignore it. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jack Gamber Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 40-60 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechnot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 19:36:58 LDLastWords: I strongly discourage "speed reading" during rounds. Providing evidence to key arguments is encouraged. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Greg Meyer Coach: Randolph LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 20:07:39 LDLastWords: I will accept any argumentation you give me, the only two things that I want are: 1) Clarity both with speed and argumentation, i can take speed i just have a low tolerance for unclear speed and I can read and understand butler so if I don't understand your argument you've got a problem, and argument i don't understand the first time through will have zero weight in my decision. 2) I will accept theory, a priori, any argumentation you would like to put out. I ask only that you impact, weigh, and label arguments when you make them. And, for theory, there should not be potential abuse impacts. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Sarabeth Trujillo Coach: Ridge High School LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 21:44:10 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Sarabeth Trujillo Coach: Ridge High School LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 03 Dec 2008 Time: 21:50:01 LDLastWords: I am more than willing to keep time in the round, but prefer a timekeeper if possible. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Margarita Nachevnik Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 03:44:42 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Dr Bernadette Boden-Albala Coach: John Jay High School LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: line-by-line analysis LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 06:21:43 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Melinda McCormack Coach: Half Hollow Hills, Chaminade, Syosset, Jericho, Cold Spring Harbor LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: line-by-line analysis LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 07:39:24 LDLastWords: I would like to discourage speakers from attempting to include more than three value criterion in the debate. The use of subtopics ad nauseam is viewed as an attempt to trap one's opponent into a failure to respond thereby winning by default rather than merit. Speed is not the enemy unless the speaker is unable to speak clearly, avoids any use of punctuation, or simply uses speed to cram in superfluous "data" for the same reason already stated herein. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Aarian Marshall Coach: Berkeley Carroll LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 08:23:48 LDLastWords: I debated for four years for Berkeley Carroll, and I'm just out of the activity. That said, I'm not big on theory--you'll have to explain it really well for me to vote on it--nor am I familiar with most critical positions. I'd prefer a slower debate, but I can deal with some speed; if you're going too fast, I'll yell "clear." And don't be rude. 'Nuff said. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Brian Holler Coach: Catonsville LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 11+ years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 09:39:59 LDLastWords: I am an open-minded tabula rasa judge who nevertheless wants a round heavy on analysis, whether it be philosophical or empirical. I will flow everything, but an argument's value comes through its impact back to your value/criterion or directly against the opponent's args or standard. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jake Singer Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 13:18:01 LDLastWords: Do not focus on the technicalities of the round. Focus on the other person's weakness in their argument and the logic used. To do so appears like a blatant avoidance of the issues/resolution. Jargon is distracting and prevents the debater from freely explaining their defense/criticism of the case. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 13:18:29 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Long Tran Coach: LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 16:50:12 LDLastWords: I prefer to see clash. More often than not debaters are speaking past each other rather than to each other. I don't usually buy the non-unique argument. If your opponent points out a harm, defend how you can mitigate it, rather than argue that it occurs on your opponent's side. I am a huge fan of turns as well (don't try do it if you don't know how). I personally think they show the best type of ingenuity and rapid thinking that embodies a great debater. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Pat Luccarelli Coach: Regis LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 18:57:58 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: George King Coach: Regis LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 20:26:50 LDLastWords: Quality of arguments outweighs quantity, and excessive speed and jargon detract from the clarity of your presentation. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Erik Eckholm Coach: Stuyvesant, Hunter College LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 20:27:33 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Babu Vijay Coach: Stuyvesant LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 20:28:25 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: Stuyvesant LDArea: Community Judge LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is the primary means by which I make my decision. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 20:29:32 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Denise Palmieri Coach: Regis High School LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: line-by-line analysis LDVoting_Issues: moving down the flownot necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 04 Dec 2008 Time: 21:54:30 LDLastWords: developed argument, delivery and engaging opponent's argument ******************************************************************************* Judge: Richard Henkle Coach: WT Woodson LDArea: Former Policy Debater LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: at the end of the final speechabsolutely necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 03:38:53 LDLastWords: Policy background, so speed is okay, but since I'm fairly new to LD, I will follow you better if you slow down a bit. Beyond that, I'm pretty open to just about anything you want to do in the round. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Reena Raggi Denton Coach: Regis LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is not neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 05:54:16 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Jimi Morales Coach: Niskayuna, Arthur L. Johnson LDArea: Current LD Coach LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 08:14:39 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Kathy McCann Coach: Niskayuna LDArea: No LD Judging Experience LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I only outline the important arguments of each debater's case. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 08:15:46 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Vijay Adi Coach: Niskayuna LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I only outline the important arguments of each debater's case. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 08:16:37 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Max Katz Coach: Niskayuna, Monticello LDArea: Former Policy Debater LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 20-40 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 08:17:41 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Dharak Bhavsar Coach: Niskayuna LDArea: Former LD competitor LDYears: 1-3 years LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Slow, Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I only outline the important arguments of each debater's case. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 08:18:36 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Rebecca Lish Coach: Hunter LDArea: No LD Judging Experience LDYears: No Experience LDRounds: 0-20 rds. LDRate: Typical Conversational Style LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptableabsolutely necessary LDJargon: should be kept to a minimum LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I write down the key arguments throughout the round. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 12:32:00 LDLastWords: Given my relative inexperience as an LD judge you should watch closely to see whether I am following you. If I cannot understand your arguments due to your speed or use of jargon then I will not have adequate ground to evaluate your arguments. I encourage you to be clear about voting issues throughout and to review them in crystallization. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Julia Hong Sabella Coach: LDArea: Experienced LD Judge LDYears: 6-10 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is always neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep detailed notes throughout the round. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 16:40:54 LDLastWords: Outline-1a, 2b etc. are fine when referring to a point. Correct syntax, meaningful use of statistics as evidence, appropriate examples are ok. Famous quotations are optional. No shouting matches-keep the tones lower. I have no students in Ridge H.S. but I am judging for Ridge as a "floater"-diff. categories. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Max Katz Coach: Niskayuna, Monticello LDArea: Former Policy Debater LDYears: 4-5 years LDRounds: 60+ rounds LDRate: Rapid Conversational Speed LDDeliveryWeight: No LDDeliveryViolation: No LDCriterion: It may be a factor depending on its use in the round. LDCriterionWeight: No LDFinal_Rebuttal: both LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: acceptable LDWinner: the winner of the key arguments in the round. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 05 Dec 2008 Time: 17:03:27 LDLastWords: I was a policy debater but I have plenty of experience with judging LD/analyzing resolutions so you should feel free to debate normally. ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: It is a major factor in my evaluation. LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: voting issues LDVoting_Issues: either is acceptablenot necessary LDJargon: unacceptable LDWinner: the person who persuaded me more of his/her position overall. LDEvidence: Evidence is somewhat neccessary in LD Debate LDNotes: I keep a rigorous flow. Date: 07 Oct 2009 Time: 07:10:57 LDLastWords: ******************************************************************************* Judge: Coach: Brooklyn LDArea: Select your experience with LD Debate LDYears: Experience LDRounds: Rounds LDRate: Select the rate of delivery in LD Debate you prefer LDDeliveryWeight: Yes LDDeliveryViolation: Yes LDCriterion: Select the weight you place on the Criterion in LD Debate LDCriterionWeight: Yes LDFinal_Rebuttal: Select one LDVoting_Issues: Select oneSelect one LDJargon: Select one LDWinner: Select the best answer on who is the winner of the debate LDEvidence: How necessary is evidence (analytical and empirical) in the round? LDNotes: Select the answer that best describes how you flow the round Date: 06 Dec 2009 Time: 17:53:53 LDLastWords: